Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting.

Authors:
Roth TL, Puig-Saus C, Yu R, Shifrut E, Carnevale J, Li PJ, Hiatt J, Saco J, Krystofinski P, Li H, Tobin V, Nguyen DN, Lee MR, Putnam AL, Ferris AL, Chen JW, Schickel JN, Pellerin L, Carmody D, Alkorta-Aranburu G, Del Gaudio D, Matsumoto H, Morell M, Mao Y, Cho M, Quadros RM, Gurumurthy CB, Smith B, Haugwitz M, Hughes SH, Weissman JS, Schumann K, Esensten JH, May AP, Ashworth A, Kupfer GM, Greeley SAW, Bacchetta R, Meffre E, Roncarolo MG, Romberg N, Herold KC, Ribas A, Leonetti MD, Marson A.
In:
Source: Nature
Publication Date: (2018)
Issue: 559: 405-9
Research Area:
Cancer Research/Cell Biology
Immunotherapy / Hematology
Cells used in publication:
T cell, human stim.
Species: human
Tissue Origin: blood
Platform:
4D-Nucleofector® 96-well Systems
4D-Nucleofector® X-Unit
Experiment

Primary T cell electroporation. RNPs and HDR templates were electroporated 2 days after initial T cell stimulation. T cells were collected from their culture vessels and magnetic anti-CD3/anti-CD28 dynabeads were removed by placing cells on an EasySep cell separation magnet for 2 min. Immediately before electroporation, de-beaded cells were centrifuged for 10 min at 90g, aspirated, and resuspended in the Lonza electroporation buffer P3 using 20 µl buffer per 1 million cells. For optimal editing, 1 million T cells were electroporated per well using a Lonza 4D 96-well electroporation system with pulse code EH115. Alternate cell concentrations from 200,000 up to 2 million cells per well resulted in lower transformation efficiencies. Alternate electroporation buffers were used as indicated, but had different optimal pulse settings (EO155 for OMEM buffer). Unless otherwise indicated, 2.5 µl RNPs (50 pmol total) were electroporated, along with 2 µl HDR Template at 2 µg µl-1 (4 µg HDR template total).


Highly cited Nature research article: 

Swift Gene-Editing Method May Revolutionize Treatments for Cancer and Infectious Diseases.

Scientists report that they have discovered a way to tweak genes in the body’s immune cells by using electrical fields.

 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/11/health/gene-editing-cancer.html

Abstract

Decades of work have aimed to genetically reprogram T cells for therapeutic purposes1,2 using recombinant viral vectors, which do not target transgenes to specific genomic sites3,4. The need for viral vectors has slowed down research and clinical use as their manufacturing and testing is lengthy and expensive. Genome editing brought the promise of specific and efficient insertion of large transgenes into target cells using homology-directed repair5,6. Here we developed a CRISPR-Cas9 genome-targeting system that does not require viral vectors, allowing rapid and efficient insertion of large DNA sequences (greater than one kilobase) at specific sites in the genomes of primary human T cells, while preserving cell viability and function. This permits individual or multiplexed modification of endogenous genes. First, we applied this strategy to correct a pathogenic IL2RA mutation in cells from patients with monogenic autoimmune disease, and demonstrate improved signalling function. Second, we replaced the endogenous T cell receptor (TCR) locus with a new TCR that redirected T cells to a cancer antigen. The resulting TCR-engineered T cells specifically recognized tumour antigens and mounted productive anti-tumour cell responses in vitro and in vivo. Together, these studies provide preclinical evidence that non-viral genome targeting can enable rapid and flexible experimental manipulation and therapeutic engineering of primary human immune cells.